联想 IdeaPad 510

联想 IdeaPad 510

联想 IdeaPad 510-15ISK 笔记本电脑简短评测白色视野。 尽管我们的测试编辑不愿意迎娶这台联想的轻盈小巧的15寸多媒体设备,但他并不介意和它建立商务联系。这台新设备搭配了独立GeForce 940MX显卡,在测试中没有表现出任何缺陷。它最大的特色依然是它白色的外观,这可能会对女性消费者有更大的吸引力。Sven Kloevekorn, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 10/08/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

🇵🇱 🇳🇱 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇫🇷 Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

4 Reviews ← exclude selected types

Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK (Ideapad 510 Series)ProcessorIntel Core i5-6200U 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, SkylakeGraphics adapterNVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1242 MHz, RAM: 1800 MHz, DDR3, ForceWare 359.23Memory8 GB , DDR4, 2133 MHz, 双通道, 1x 板载 + 1x 插槽, 两个内存槽一个已占用Display15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LGD04A7 / LG Display LP156WF6-SPK2 , IPS, glossy: noMainboardIntel Skylake-U Premium PCHStorageSeagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB, 1000 GB , 5400 rpmSoundcardIntel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition AudioConnections1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合音频输入输出接口, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, MMC, Brightness SensorNetworkingRealtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1Optical driveHL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE0NSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 22.9 x 379 x 260Battery30 Wh Lithium-IonOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 10 Home 64 BitCameraWebcam: 100万像素Additional featuresSpeakers: 立体声/Harman, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months WarrantyWeight2.2 kg, Power Supply: 209 g

Price799 EURLinksLenovo homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications

Size Comparison

Asus N552VX-FY103T Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK HP Pavilion 14-al003ng DIN A4 ❌

» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名

Left: power-in, Ethernet (fold-out), HDMI, USB 3.0, audio in/out, SD card

Right: LED, USB 3.0, USB 2.0, DVD drive, Kensington

SD Card Reader

average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)HP Pavilion 14-al003ng

73.7 MB/s +341%Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1

57.4 MB/s +244%Asus N552VX-FY103T

55 MB/s +229%Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK

16.7 MB/s maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)Asus N552VX-FY103T

84.7 MB/s +222%HP Pavilion 14-al003ng

80.8 MB/s +207%Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK

26.3 MB/s

Networking

iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 mAcer Aspire E5-774G-78NAQualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (seb)

331 MBit/s +26%Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISKQualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter

276 MBit/s +5%Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISKQualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (Seb)

263 MBit/s iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 mLenovo Ideapad 310-15ISKQualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter

334 MBit/s +27%Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NAQualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (seb)

327 MBit/s +25%Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISKQualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (Seb)

262 MBit/s

295cd/m²305cd/m²308cd/m²249cd/m²284cd/m²275cd/m²246cd/m²260cd/m²261cd/m²

Distribution of brightnessLG Philips LGD04A7 / LG Display LP156WF6-SPK2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 308 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 275.9 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 80 %Center on Battery: 284 cd/m²Contrast: 861:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 7.21 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.83}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 6.86 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)40.59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)58.7% sRGB (Argyll 3D)39.26% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.46CCT: 6726 KDownload ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISKAcer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1Asus N552VX-FY103THP Pavilion 14-al003ngDisplay96%60% Display P3 Coverage39.2684.2 114%67.9 73% sRGB Coverage58.799.7 70%87.7 49% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage40.5982.7 104%64 58%Response Times-3%-7%2% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *40 ?(19, 21)44 ?(24, 20, starke Schwankungen mit/ohne PSU) -10%42 ?(18, 24) -5%36.4 ?(18, 18.4) 9% Response Time Black / White *24 ?(9, 15)23 ?(7, 16, Plateau) 4%26 ?(5, 21) -8%25.2 ?(14, 11.2) -5% PWM Frequency50 ?(90)1000 ?(80)Screen-15%25%8%Brightness middle284234 -18%336 18%220 -23%Brightness276219 -21%304 10%209 -24%Brightness Distribution8080 0%85 6%88 10%Black Level *0.330.48 -45%0.34 -3%0.28 15%Contrast861488 -43%988 15%786 -9%Colorchecker dE 2000 *7.2111.8 -64%5.26 27%4.58 36%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *15.1220.69 -37%10.49 31%11.47 24%Greyscale dE 2000 *6.8613.3 -94%4.26 38%2.34 66%Gamma2.46 89%2.47 89%2.35 94%2.26 97%CCT6726 97%17098 38%6758 96%6661 98%Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)3774 100%57 54%34.6 -6%Color Space (Percent of sRGB)58100 72%88 52%54.2 -7%Total Average (Program / Settings)26% /

9%26% /

28%5% /

7%* ... smaller is better

Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise↘ 15 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise↘ 21 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 50 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness settingThe display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8320 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15

CPU Single 64BitAsus N552VX-FY103TIntel Core i7-6700HQ

146 Points +34%Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1Intel Core i5-6200U

119 Points +9%HP Pavilion 14-al003ngIntel Core i5-6200U

115 Points +6%Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISKIntel Core i5-6200U

109 Points CPU Multi 64BitAsus N552VX-FY103TIntel Core i7-6700HQ

673 Points +130%Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1Intel Core i5-6200U

295 Points +1%Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISKIntel Core i5-6200U

293 Points HP Pavilion 14-al003ngIntel Core i5-6200U

270 Points -8%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit109 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit293 Points

Help... in comparison

PCMark 8

Home Score Accelerated v2Asus N552VX-FY103TGeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H

3452 Points +5%Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0

3390 Points +3%Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISKGeForce 940MX, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB

3294 Points HP Pavilion 14-al003ngGeForce 940MX, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280

3238 Points -2% Work Score Accelerated v2Asus N552VX-FY103TGeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H

4503 Points +15%Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0

3970 Points +2%Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISKGeForce 940MX, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB

3907 Points

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2

3294 pointsPCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2

3907 pointsHelp

Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISKSeagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBBAcer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0Asus N552VX-FY103TToshiba MQ02ABD100HHP Pavilion 14-al003ngSanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280CrystalDiskMark 3.042%12563% Read Seq84.5108.1 28%469.3 455% Write Seq69.9105.6 51%309.1 342% Read 51228.8735.32 22% Write 51228.0846.13 64% Read 4k0.3260.413 27%14 4194% Write 4k0.5950.9 51%73.9 12320% Read 4k QD320.6020.895 49%149.5 24734% Write 4k QD320.6120.884 44%204.6 33331%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBBTransfer Rate Minimum:

36.4 MB/s

Transfer Rate Maximum:

101.3 MB/s

Transfer Rate Average:

78.4 MB/s

Access Time:

18.2 ms

Burst Rate:

185 MB/s

CPU Usage:

5.9 %

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBBSequential Read:

84.5 MB/s

Sequential Write:

69.9 MB/s

512K Read:

28.87 MB/s

512K Write:

28.08 MB/s

4K Read:

0.326 MB/s

4K Write:

0.595 MB/s

4K QD32 Read:

0.602 MB/s

4K QD32 Write:

0.612 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU

Asus N552VX-FY103TNVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ

4416 Points +88%Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U

4239 Points +81%HP Pavilion 14-al003ngNVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U

2508 Points +7%Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISKNVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U

2343 Points 3DMark

1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard GraphicsAsus N552VX-FY103TNVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ

21794 Points +155%Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U

21635 Points +153%Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISKNVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U

8541 Points 1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsAcer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U

3555 Points +125%Asus N552VX-FY103TNVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ

3233 Points +105%Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISKNVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U

1580 Points

3DMark 11 Performance

2424 points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score

5765 points3DMark Fire Strike Score

1381 pointsHelp... in comparison

lowmed.highultraBioShock Infinite (2013)

85.2

45

39.3

13.6

The Witcher 3 (2015)

30.1

17.6

Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)

30.8

18.1

Noise Level

Idle

33.6 / 33.6 / 33.9 dB(A)Load

37.5 / 38.3 dB(A)

30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud

min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 31.2 dB(A)

Max. LoadIdle

37.2 °C35 °C26.9 °C 36.5 °C34.6 °C26.8 °C 33.8 °C34.1 °C27.2 °C

Maximum: 37.2 °CAverage: 32.5 °C

25.1 °C36.3 °C37.2 °C24.6 °C31 °C39 °C27.1 °C29 °C34 °C

Maximum: 39 °CAverage: 31.5 °C Power Supply (max.) 39.2 °C | Room Temperature 22.6 °C | FIRT 550-PocketMax. LoadIdle

25.6 °C25.6 °C24.9 °C 25.5 °C26.3 °C24.5 °C 25.9 °C26.4 °C26 °C

Maximum: 26.4 °CAverage: 25.6 °C

24.6 °C25.7 °C25.1 °C24.5 °C26.2 °C26.2 °C26.6 °C25.7 °C26.8 °C

Maximum: 26.8 °CAverage: 25.7 °C Power Supply (max.) 28.7 °C | Room Temperature 22.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.1 °C / 93.4 F) and are therefore not hot. (-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-5.4 °C / -9.7 F).

Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK audio analysis(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)Compared to same class» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 22% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Asus N552VX-FY103T audio analysis(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

HP Pavilion 14-al003ng audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)Compared to same class» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 17% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby 0.3 / 0.2 WattIdle 7.7 / 11.7 / 13.6 Watt

Load

48.3 / 41 Watt

Key:

min: ,

med: ,

max: Metrahit Energy

Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK6200U, GeForce 940MX, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V16200U, GeForce GTX 950M, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"Asus N552VX-FY103T6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H, AH-IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"HP Pavilion 14-al003ng6200U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280, LED IPS, 1920x1080, 14"Power Consumption-22%-39%19%Idle Minimum *7.78.3 -8%7 9%4 48%Idle Average *11.712.1 -3%10.9 7%6.4 45%Idle Maximum *13.615.4 -13%12.9 5%7 49%Load Average *48.356 -16%72 -49%45.5 6%Load Maximum *4170 -71%109 -166%62.2 -52%* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)

7h 23min

WiFi Websurfing

3h 45min

DVD

2h 17min

Load (maximum brightness)

1h 13min

Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK6200U, GeForce 940MX, 30 WhAcer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V16200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 WhAsus N552VX-FY103T6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, 44 WhHP Pavilion 14-al003ng6200U, GeForce 940MX, 41 WhBattery Runtime77%-2%46%Reader / Idle443667 51%357 -19%WiFi v1.3225386 72%268 19%329 46%Load73152 108%68 -7%H.264335

Pros+ 轻盈纤薄

+ 经典机身设计与白色材质

+ 不错的工艺品质

+ 支持TPM 2.0

+ 两个维护底盖

+ 优秀的加速利用率

+ 安静清凉Cons- 缓慢的SD读卡器

- 风扇只有拆机才可以接触到

- 较小的色域覆盖

- 屏幕闪烁

- 未使用固态硬盘造成系统响应较慢

- 缓慢的传统硬盘

- 电池续航短

In review: Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de联想IdeaPad 510-15ISK是一款引人注目的设备。

选择它的用户可以得到一台做工精良,轻盈纤薄的多媒体笔记本电脑,它结合了不错的输入设备,一块IPS屏幕和GeForce 940MX独立显卡,售价不足800欧元(约5926人民币)。尽管这个机型没有搭配固态硬盘,但它没有任何技术上的弱点。

不过,它在很多方面表现平平。至少它高对比度IPS屏幕的色彩准确度还有改进的空间,同时一般的性能和不算出色的输入设备也是如此。再加上缺少固态硬盘让它的系统运行更加迟缓。它的电池续航让不错的便携型打了折扣,而音响系统也很难达到多媒体设备的一般水平。

不过,它提供了维护底盖和TPM模组,系统运行安静而清凉让它对处理器加速的效率很高,这都为它赢得了加分。我们认为如果考虑到性价比的话,如果它的售价可以降低100欧元(约740人民币)的话将会十分值得考虑选购。从我们的经验来看它在不久之后就会开始降价。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。

Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK

- 09/29/2016 v5.1 (old)

Sven Kloevekorn

Chassis81 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard79%

Pointing Device92%

Connectivity45 / 81 → 56%

Weight62 / 20-67 → 89%

Battery74%

Display83%

Games Performance64 / 85 → 75%

Application Performance72 / 92 → 78%

Temperature93%

Noise81 / 95 → 85%

Audio64%

Camera58 / 85 → 68%

Average73%

79%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

// 相关文章

联想ZUK Z2和小米5买哪个好?小米5/ZUK Z2对比评测
365被限制如何解决

联想ZUK Z2和小米5买哪个好?小米5/ZUK Z2对比评测

⌛ 07-03 ⚠️ 3973
【已解決】iPad解除學校監管2種實用方法,MDM破解如此簡單!
频频爆红的故事性广告,都有哪些共同的套路?
365bet开户注册

频频爆红的故事性广告,都有哪些共同的套路?

⌛ 07-31 ⚠️ 2876